Monday, July 12, 2010

Speech by Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad on International Conference on Gaza, 11 July 2010

BREAKING THE SIEGE OF GAZA

We must end the Apartheid and establish an Independent Palestine State

Honourable speakers, guests, ladies and gentlemen,

Firstly I would like to welcome all of you to this conference on the siege
organised by the Perdana Global Peace Organisation backed by UMNO.

1. We are gathered here today not only to honour the Turkish martyrs who
were brutally slaughtered by Israeli commandos on the Mavi Marmara, but
also to counter the lies and propaganda by Israel and the Zionist
controlled international mass media, that the passengers, specifically the
martyrs, were terrorists and therefore the killings were justified.

2. More importantly, we must send a message of hope and solidarity to the
Palestinians that the peace loving peoples of the world will never abandon
them, come what may and that we will stand shoulder to shoulder with
them in their struggle for liberation and for the State of Palestine.

3. Prime Minister Netanyahu has openly and unreservedly declared just a
few days ago that Israel will not apologise for the brutal murders
committed in international waters in contravention of all conventions and
international laws because Israel was justified in the massacre of unarmed
people in order to defend Israeli security.

4. Netanyahu said in an interview with Israel’s Channel 1:

“Israel cannot apologise for our soldiers being forced to defend
themselves against the mob that almost slaughtered them.”

Yet, not one single Israeli commando was killed. In fact, from the
testimony of Ken O’Keefe, a passenger on Mavi Marmara, which we have
just witnessed from the multi-media presentation, it was the well-armed
commandos who killed and injured the passengers. Far from killing or
attempting to kill the commandos, despite their friends being killed, the
Turkish passengers managed to disarm three of the commandos and after
a doctor had washed away the blood caused by their faces being
scratched, released them. Is this the behaviour of a mob bent in
slaughtering the commandos?

5. In a speech to the Israeli parliament, Netanyahu elaborated:

2
“They want to strip us of the natural right to defend ourselves. When we
defend ourselves against rocket attack, we are accused of war crimes. We
cannot board sea vessels when our soldiers are being attacked and fired
upon, because that is a war crime.”

6. But where is the evidence that the Israeli commandos were being attacked
and fired upon? Such is the distortion of the truth! Even the UN Report
chaired by Justice Robert Goldstone, a Zionist and a Jew who found that
the Israelis committed war crimes when it invaded Gaza in 2008, was
dismissed as mere propaganda, and the said report was not allowed to be
tabled and debated in the U.N.

7. Self-defence can take place if there was an attempt at attacking or when
actually attacked by the aggressor. Even the Israelis said that the
passengers were armed with iron rods (railings) and scissors. Is Israel
suggesting that people with scissors and iron railings attacked the fully
armed commandos before they boarded the Mavi Marmara? It was to
defend themselves after the commandos dropped from the helicopters
and killed their friends that the unarmed passengers tried to defend
themselves with scissors and iron railings, the only weapons they could
lay hands on.

8. However, even without an Independent Inquiry and in spite of the fact that
Israel had confiscated and destroyed incriminating videos of the
massacre, the international mass media cannot ignore the overwhelming
evidence provided by the survivors of Mavi Marmara - journalists and
passengers who were able to evade the tight security measures and
brought out videos showing that Israeli commandos had commenced firing
at the passengers before boarding the Mavi Marmara. IHH, the
organisers of the Mavi Marmara has just come out with their report and I
am told that this is available in CD for all delegates.

9. Additionally, we cannot ignore the fact that the intent to attack the
Freedom Flotilla was made well before the flotilla set sail for Gaza. Prime
Minister Netanyahu and Defence Minister Ehud Barak declared that Israeli
naval ships and commandos would be conducting naval exercises to
prepare for the eventual attack on the flotilla and that Israel would do
everything possible to prevent the flotilla from reaching Gaza. This was
reported by Bloomberg, the Associated Press and even Israeli
newspapers, and was affirmed by the Israeli Ambassador to the United
States, Michael Oren in an interview on June 2nd, 2010.

10. It came as no surprise that on 31st May 2010, in contravention of
international laws, Israeli commandos as directed by the Israeli regime
boarded the Mavi Marmara, and in the process shot and killed nine
3
passengers and wounded many more and hijacked the entire flotilla to the
port of Ashdod in Israel.

11. Rifat Audeh, a passenger on the Mavi Marmara gave an account of what
happened before Israeli commandos boarded the Mavi Marmara. She
said:

“The Israeli military was firing at us from their vessels which approached
the sides of our ship and the helicopters from above as well, even before a
single soldier landed on deck. Here we had fully armed Israeli commandos
firing live rounds, tear gas, sound grenades and other types of ammunition
at unarmed activists of a humanitarian ship at night in international waters,
and once again the media has criminalised us and vindicated the
perpetrators. Let me be clear: we had every right to defend ourselves and
our ship against this illegal barbaric assault as our brothers were being
wounded and killed.”

12. Just as Israel denied using white phosphorous and other banned weapons
on the civilians of Gaza in the barbaric invasion in 2008 and the massacre
of civilians in Jenin in 2003 until exposed by the Robert Goldstone report
and independent observers respectively, Israel is denying again and
hopes that this time, the war crimes would be lost with the passage of
time.

13. But peace loving nations of the world condemned this wanton aggression
and demanded that the siege of Gaza be lifted and a U.N. sanctioned
Inquiry be established to investigate into the massacre of the passengers
on the Mavi Marmara.

14. Knowing that the United States will not condemn its actions and veto any
Security Council resolutions that demanded a full account for the incident,
Israel ignored international condemnation and maintained that she has the
right to do as she likes. Israel considers itself above international laws
and common moral values.

15. This heinous murder of Turkish nationals and the confiscation of the
Turkish ship, Mavi Marmara seemed strange to many, as Turkey has been
a close strategic ally of Israel for many years, having regular joint military
exercises and shared strategic interests. Turkey is also a NATO member.
However, it is evident that even an ally would not be spared the criminal
behaviour of Israel whether there is justification or not.

16. Such is Israel’s arrogance and her confidence that she can get away with
murder. And indeed Israel has been getting away with blatant murder
since 1948.

4
17. Many may have forgotten that such betrayal by Israel of an ally is not
without precedent. The ally that was previously betrayed by Israel was
none other than the United States. That treachery needs to be retold, if we
want to understand and appreciate the strategic implications of the attack
on Mavi Marmara.

18. It was on the 8th of June, 1967, soon after the commencement of the six-
day war by Israel against her Arab neighbours. President Johnson had
given his consent to Israel to launch a limited war against Egypt on the
condition that Israel would not widen the war to include any land grab
against Jordan and Syria.

19. Egypt had closed the Straits of Tiran to Israeli ships and the limited war
was to compel Egypt to reopen the Straits of Tiran to Israeli ships. But,
the then Defence Minister Moshe Dayan had different ideas from what
was agreed between President Johnson and the then prime minister of
Israel, Levi Eshkol and his military Chief of Staff, General Yizhak Rabin.
Moshe Dayan, the one-eyed war criminal wanted to use the opportunity to
extend the borders of Israel to fulfil the aspirations of the Zionists for a
“Greater Israel.” It was in the plan that after the capture of the Sinai
Peninsula, Israeli military would be diverted to the Jordanian and Syrian
fronts.

20. The USS Liberty was a “spy ship” and its mission was to listen to all
Israel’s military communications so that Israel would abide by the
agreement not to widen the war after she attacked Egypt.

21. The USS Liberty clearly stood in the way, as President Johnson would
know through communication intercepts by the USS Liberty, if Israel
reneged on its agreement for a limited war, and proceeded to wage a full
scale war against all her immediate neighbours. Time was of the
essence. If the USS Liberty was disabled, Israel would by her surprise
attack against Syria and Jordan achieve her aims of a Greater Israel
before President Johnson could intervene to stop the wider war.

22. General Moshe Dayan therefore ordered the attack on the USS Liberty
that left 34 Americans dead and 175 wounded and severely damaged the
ship. The captain of a nearby US aircraft carrier scrambled jet fighters to
assist the USS Liberty but his orders were countermanded by President
Johnson and Defence Secretary Robert McNamara. The excuse for the
attack was that Israel made a mistake as to the identity of the USS Liberty.
Moshe Dayan hailed the day of the attack, 8th June 1967 as a “Great Day”
because the destruction of USS Liberty enabled Israel to extend its
borders to encompass the Golan Heights and the entire West Bank and
more! The fact that President Johnson had to cover up the murder of his
own soldiers and accepted thereafter the fait accompli of a Greater Israel
5
shows all too clearly that the United States was and is still subservient to
Israel.

23. The international mass media propaganda at the material time accused
the Arab states for starting the war and wanting to annihilate Israel. Once
again, we have to ask, who is telling the truth?

24. We need only to examine some public statements of Israel’s military
leaders at the given time. On 28th February 1968, Yitzhak Rabin, the
Israeli Chief of Staff in an interview with Le Monde, conceded that:

“I do not believe that Nasser wanted war. The two divisions which he sent
to Sinai on 14th May would not have been enough to unleash an offensive
against Israel. He knew it and we knew it.”
Menachem Begin, then Minister without Portfolio was quoted by the New
York Times in 1982 as saying:
"In June l967, we had a choice. The Egyptian Army concentrations in the
Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us.
We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him."

25. Given this hidden agenda, how did Israel prepare the propaganda for war
against the Arabs? The strategy was simple enough – portray Israel as
the victim. In an interview with Al-Hamishmar in 1971, Mordecai Bentove,
then Minister of Housing revealed:

“The entire story of the danger of extermination was invented in every
detail and exaggerated a posteriori to justify the annexation of new Arab
territory.”
26. This deliberate lie was corroborated by General Haim Barlev, Chief of
General Staff Branch, Israel Defence Forces and as reported by the Israeli
newspaper Ma’ arrive in 1972. I quote:
"We were not threatened with genocide on the eve of the six-day war, and
we had never thought of such a possibility."
General Chaim Herzog, Commanding General and first Military Governor
of Israeli Occupied West Bank expressed similar views when he said:
"There was no danger of annihilation. Israeli headquarters never believed
in this danger. "

27. From these facts we can draw the following conclusions, namely:

6
a) Israel treats her allies no different from her enemies if its interests
are threatened.
b) It is by deception and outright lies, that Israel wages war.

28. Not for nothing is, “by way of deception” the motto of Mossad, the Israeli
intelligence unit. The attack against the Turkish ship and the Turks is thus
typical of the Israelis. They knew and yet they shot to kill the Turks with
live bullets. Given this sordid history, it comes as no surprise that
President Obama chose to express regrets instead of condemnation of the
murder of the nine passengers, one of whom was an American citizen of
Turkish descent. He was only nineteen years old. Tony Blair, the war
criminal and the so-called Special Peace Envoy for the Quartet for the
Middle East declared that Israel was acting in self-defence when it
attacked the passenger ship Mavi Marmara and hijacked the entire flotilla
to the port of Ashdod.

A question remains to be answered – Did President Obama know in
advance of the attack on Mavi Marmara and give his consent just as
President Johnson did when Israel attacked Egypt in 1967 in the six-day
war?

29. It is inconceivable that the intelligence services of the United States were
unaware of such plans by the Israeli military. The President of the United
States is briefed daily by the intelligence services. And given the special
relationship between Israel and the United States, it would be naive to
think that Israel would not share intelligence regarding what they consider
their mutual security interests. In the just concluded visit by Netanyahu to
the White House, the prime minister remarked that:

“There is a depth and richness of this relationship that is expressed every
day. Our teams talk. We don’t make it public… What is not told is the fact
we have an enduring bond of values, interests, beginning with security
and the way we share both information and other things to help the
common defence of our common interests. The President said it best
in his speech in Cairo. He said it in front of the entire Islamic world, he
said, the bond between Israel and the United States is unbreakable. And I
can affirm that to you today.”

30. Yet, the Muslim world continues to be taken in by President Obama’s
rhetoric that he is committed to change and he is for peace. His actions
contradict his spoken words, for upon receiving the Nobel Peace Prize,
President Obama then escalated the war in Afghanistan, a war started by
President GW Bush. It is not surprising that the UN chose not to allow a
debate on Malaysia’s resolution condemning Israel for its dastardly acts.

7
31. Given this reaffirmation by President Obama and Netanyahu, we must not
be deluded into believing that there will be peace, genuine peace in the
Middle East anytime soon. On the contrary, war preparations are in place.
The same lies have been repeated. Have we not heard the same refrain,
that Israel’s very existence is threatened by her neighbours? A thief
shouting thief as he runs away with the booty is a most effective way of
deflecting focus on his thieving. That is Israel’s strategy.

32. Iraq was accused of having weapons of mass destruction so as to appear
to be a threat to Israel’s existence. Israel demanded that Iraq be invaded
and its people subjugated. And so in 2003, Iraq was invaded. But as we
now know Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction. Iraq was attacked
because the plans for the invasion of Iraq were laid much earlier. In 1996,
the then prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu commissioned the
Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies to prepare a blue
print to enable Israel to be the dominant regional power in the Middle East.
The report, A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm
sets out the new paradigm for Israel. According to its authors, the
centerpiece of the recommendations was the removal of Saddam
Hussein as the first step in remaking the Middle East into a region
friendly to Israel. Their plan also signaled a radical departure from the
peace-oriented policies of former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, who was
assassinated by a member of an extreme right-wing Israeli group.

33. One of the pillars of this new policy was the abandonment of the
"comprehensive peace" with the entire Arab world. Israel’s new strategy
would be to work jointly with Jordan and Turkey to "contain,
destabilise, and roll-back" those entities that were regarded as threats
to all three (i.e. Israel, Turkey and Jordan), firstly by destroying Iraq and
then Syria and finally Iran. This is the significance of Turkey in the
overall scheme of Netanyahu under the “Clean Break” master plan.

34. Now that Iraq and Saddam Hussein have been disposed, the target has
shifted to Iran as Syria is seen to be a lesser threat. The world is made to
believe once again the lie that Israel’s existence is being threatened by a
nuclear armed Iran, notwithstanding that El Baradie, the former head of
the IAEA had repeatedly stated that there is no evidence that Iran has a
nuclear weapons program. President Bush had threatened Iran with
tactical nuclear weapons. President Obama is no different for he has said
that “all options are on the table” in confronting Iran.

35. And once again, the United States at the instigation of Israel has
compelled the UN Security Council to impose crippling sanctions to
weaken the resolve of the Iranians to resist Israel’s aggressive designs.
We can observe a pattern in the war preparations from recent examples,
namely Iraq and Gaza. Broad sanctions were imposed on Iraq and Gaza
8
to starve and weaken the people before the military invasion in 2003 and
2008 respectively. If the past is a precedent, then it is a matter of time
before the war criminals in Israel and the United States launch another
war of aggression, once Iran has been weakened by sanctions.

36. However, Israel may have miscalculated the willingness of Turkey to be a
partner in its grand design to contain Iran and Syria as envisaged in the
Clean Break blue print. As it stands at the present moment, the
encirclement of Iran – Afghanistan in the East, occupied Iraq in the West
and Turkey in the North rests on shaky foundations. But this may not deter
the warmongers from attempting to fulfill their design for a “New Middle-
East”. There is already a map showing how the Middle East would be
carved out to serve Israel’s strategic interests.

37. It is left to be seen whether Israel’s blood lust for wars of conquest can be
accomplished without Turkey as part of the equation as stipulated in the
Clean Break blue print. Turkey has demanded that Israel apologises for
the brutal murder of its nationals, failing which Turkey would sever
diplomatic relations with Israel. Presently, Turkey has ceased all military
collaboration with Israel and a few days ago had declared that Israeli
military planes are no longer allowed to enter Turkey’s airspace. It is early
to say whether these are temporary misalignments or potential major
paradigm shifts in the foreign policy of Turkey.

38. The recent actions of prime minister Erdogan provide grounds for hope
that the forces for peace can forge a broad alliance to isolate Israel and
thwart its grand design to wage wars of aggression to establish a Greater
Israel and to be the undisputed regional power. The public dressing down
of Shimon Peres, the President of Israel at the World Economic Forum by
premier Erdogan was unprecedented as even the President of the United
States has not dared to rebuke publicly any Israeli leaders.

39. It is in the context of this geopolitical matrix that we must applaud the
courageous leadership of Prime Minister Erdogan in supporting the efforts
of IHH peace activists on board the Mavi Marmara as part of the Freedom
Flotilla to break the siege of Gaza. The supreme sacrifice by the nine
Turkish peace activists will not be in vain, as by their deaths, the true
nature of the Zionist regime, its barbarity and ugliness has been laid bare
before the world:
Israel is…

A brutal regime that has no respect for international law;
A brutish regime that has no qualms in murdering unarmed civilians on a
humanitarian mission;
9
A brutish regime that has created the largest open prison in the world, the
enslavement of 1.5 million people within its borders, through blockade and
economic sanctions of Gaza;
A brutish regime that brainwashes its young to be mindless killers of
unarmed civilians, men, women and children;
A brutish regime that practices apartheid.
A brutish regime that wages wars through deception and lies.
A brutish regime that practices and fosters state terrorism.

40. When the Perdana Global Peace Organisation visited Cyprus in July 2009
to collaborate with the activists of the free Gaza Movement, we did not
expect that our idea of a flotilla of cargo ships and passenger boats
manned by volunteers from all over the world would have such an impact
on the conscience of world leaders who before had stood aloof and cared
not for the sufferings of the Palestinians. Following the invasion of Gaza in
December 2008, more than 1,400 civilians, men, women and children, in
fact mainly children were slaughtered, over 20,000 homes were
destroyed, schools and hospitals were levelled to the ground. Many
countries pledged billions in aid, but the pledges were not translated into
concrete action to alleviate the sufferings of the Palestinians in Gaza. It
was hypocrisy at its very worst.



41. While world leaders turned their backs on Gaza, peace activists the world
over came together to challenge the might of Israel and expose their
crimes. George Galloway started the Viva Palestina Land Convoy which
smashed the land blockade and brought hundreds of truckloads of aid to
Gaza. The Free Gaza Movement had more humble beginnings. They
started by sending small fishing boats to break the sea blockade. On one
occasion, their boat was rammed and the volunteers were thrown into the
sea to drown. On another occasion, fully armed Israeli commandos
boarded their boat, The Spirit of Humanity and hijacked it to Israel. The
world took scant notice of these happenings.

42. We realised that small fishing boats would not do and that a flotilla of
cargo ships and passenger boats would be needed to challenge Israel’s
navy. And as they say, the rest is history. Malaysia’s contribution in this
effort was the purchase of a cargo ship and two passenger boats, the
former named after the courageous American peace activist Rachel Corrie
who was crushed to death by an Israel Defence Forces (IDF) bulldozer
when she acted as a human shield to prevent the demolition of Palestinian
homes in 2003. She gave her life so that others could live in freedom and
with dignity. Her country had forgotten her, but we were moved by her
determination and sacrifice to free the Palestinians.

10

43. Imbued with the spirit of Rachel Corrie, our Irish colleagues – Jenny and
Derek Graham nurtured and brought back to life the abandoned cargo
ship MV Linda and appropriately renamed her MV Rachel Corrie. The ship
was abandoned by her owners and was auctioned for 70,000 Euros. She
set sail for Gaza on 14th May and immediately encountered problems. She
had a broken propeller shaft and had to dock for repairs. She could not
join the flotilla in time and so the flotilla led by the Mavi Marmara set sail
for Gaza.

44. Following her repairs, the Rachel Corrie, determined as ever, headed for
Gaza. On board were five Irish volunteers Derek and Jenny Graham and
my good friend Denis Halliday, the former Assistant Secretary General of
the United Nations as well as the Nobel Peace Laureate, Mairead
McGuire. There were six Malaysians, two representatives from the
Perdana Global Peace Organisation, a Member of Parliament, a volunteer
from the Ministry of Information and two TV3 journalists.

45. Rachel Corrie was all alone, sailing at a mere 8 knots but she never
waivered in her resolve to reach Gaza. After the massacre of the nine
Turkish nationals on board the Mavi Marmara, massive disinformation was
initiated against Rachel Corrie. It was rumoured that she had turned tail
and headed back for Ireland. Another report stated that she was heading
for the safe haven of Cyprus and might even head for Turkey. This
propaganda was made notwithstanding that the Captain and his crew
together with all the activists on board had declared in a press statement
that in honour of the martyrs they were more determined than ever to sail
towards Gaza and bring badly needed aid, comprising of cement,
medicine and equipment, toys and educational materials.

46. Knowing that Israel had just massacred nine passengers and wounded
many more and that Israeli commandos may act similarly, Rachel Corrie
and her passengers were not deterred and were ready to face Israeli
brutality. Israel deployed four naval ships, two fast patrol boats and six
zodiacs to intercept and hijack the Rachel Corrie to Israel. This was an act
of cowardice by the Israelis – to deploy naval ships and armed
commandos to hijack a small cargo ship with unarmed passengers and
crew. By this single act of defiance, Rachel Corrie exposed Israeli
cowardice to the world.

47. This is but a beginning in our collective efforts to bring peace to the long
suffering Palestinians. Israel under tremendous international pressure
declared that it would be easing the blockade and would allow more aid to
enter Gaza. Israel must take us for fools to believe in her lies.

11
48. Let us not forget that Netanyahu is the prime minister of Israel, the same
man who in 1996 commissioned the blue print, the Clean Break which
rejected a comprehensive peace in the Middle East and opted for war – to
be precise the destruction of Iraq, Iran and Syria so as to impose peace
on its own terms. The present policy of Israel is but the continuation of the
strategies laid down in that blue print.

49. Israel has succeeded in destroying Iraq and emboldened by this success
is now moving to the next phase of the blue print, the destruction of Iran.
The time tested modus operandi of imposing harsh sanctions followed by
a vicious invasion has already started. In the just concluded visit to the
White House, Netanyahu made the following remarks at the joint press
conference with President Obama. He said with regard to sanctions on
Iran:

“I think the sanctions the President signed the other day actually have
teeth. They bite. The question is – how much do you need to bite is
something I cannot answer now. But if other nations adopt similar
sanctions, that would increase the effect.”

50. Let us be very clear. Sanctions amount to laying siege, to starve and
weaken the enemy. It pays to remind ourselves of what Dov Weisglass, an
Israeli aid to Prime Ministers, said of sanctions;

“The idea is to put the Palestinians on a diet but not to make them die of
hunger.”

The invasion would meet with little resistance after that. This is the US’
and Israeli strategy. It is a strategy based on cowardice.

51. But in spite of two years of sanctions against Gaza before the preceding
invasion of December 2008 an invasion which lasted until mid-January
2009, the Gazans withstood the siege. The Palestinians were not so easily
cowed.

52. Hence the blockade of food and medicine. It is not about preventing arms
from reaching Gaza. The blockade of the food, medicine and cement
convoy is about weakening the people of Gaza for the next orgy of
slaughter. Israel and the United States have no intention to see a
Palestinian State and for the Palestinians to live side by side with the
Israelis. Netanyahu has not said since becoming the prime minister of
Israel that he has abandoned the Clean Break blue print, and neither has
President Obama demanded that he should.

53. The warmongers continue to propagate that the ideological enemy of the
West is Islam and the Zionist controlled mass media have not ceased their
12
efforts to demonise Muslims. In the circumstances, the path for all of us,
the peace loving people of the world, is clear. We must be vigilant and be
prepared to resist any attempt by the warmongers to unleash another war,
be it with Iran, Syria and or any other country.

54. We must pursue with greater vigour our efforts to criminalise war. War is
mass killing, is massacre and must be made a crime. It is heartening to
note that recently, the International Criminal Court is also of the view that
war of aggression is a crime, but the United States under the present
leadership of President Obama opposed vehemently this noble initiative.
So once again, we are being confronted with the inevitable conclusion –
there is no change, the status quo remains and for these leaders war is
their preferred option.

55. In the circumstances, we must strive to create a broad coalition for peace
and to expose and resist the grand designs of these warmongers. Rachel
Corrie and Mavi Marmara have shown the way. The NGOs and the
volunteers have cleared the path. We must build on this momentum and
surge forward. We must call upon all governments not to be hypocritical
and stand up to this rogue State called Israel.

56. Israel cannot be allowed to continue in its present path and exist as an
Apartheid state. Just as the world would not stand for a White South
Africa, it should also not allow an apartheid state to continue its
oppression of the Palestinians. We will struggle for as long as it takes.

We will break the siege.

Palestine will be liberated from Israeli oppression.

Thank you.
.

1 comment:

armouris said...

info tentang Dr. Mahathir di SIHAT SELALU - Rahsia Muda Dr. Mahathir